Psychological Work-related Injuries: A Focus on the Psychological Work Environment
An employer’s duty to ensure that working conditions are safe and health applies not only to the physical environment but also to the psychological work environment. Mental health issues/psychological harm caused by the work environment — including harassment, bullying, or lack of managerial support — can in some cases give rise to claims for compensation as well as creating a difficult working environment.
Guidance from the Danish Working Environment Authority
The Danish Working Environment Authority has issued guidance clarifying an employer’s obligation to prevent and address psychological issues in the workplace. Pursuant to the Working Environment Act, an employer has an obligation to ensure that work is planned, organised, and performed in a way which ensures a safe and healthy work environment, this definition covers both the physical and psychological work environment. Employers have an obligation to identify and assess risks of psychological harm, for example through a workplace assessment (APV), and should develop action plans for issues that cannot be resolved immediately.
The guidance emphasises that employers should pay particular attention to issues such as bullying, sexual harassment, threats, violence, excessive workload, and lack of support. If problems arise, companies must have clear procedures in place for handling them — including how employees can report issues and how management follows up on such issues.
Recent legal developments
Recent cases indicate a trend toward stricter employer liability in cases involving psychological work injuries. The trend highlights that the courts are increasingly holding employers accountable for failing to respond to issues of serious psychological harm in the work environment, including harassment, bullying, and sexual misconduct. This development is in parallel with a rising number of reported psychological work injuries.
The cases also highlight that when assessing whether the Working Environment Act has been violated, the courts will focus on whether or not the employer has taken sufficient steps to prevent and manage abusive conduct.
Case law example -Western High Court Judgment of 16 October 2024 (U.2025.275)
In this case, messages of an explicit sexual nature were written about a female painter in elevators and common areas. The Western High Court found that the sexually offensive messages exceeded what an employee should be expected to tolerate in the workplace and that the painter had been subjected to sexual harassment during the course of her work.
The messages were so widespread and of such an offensive nature that the court held that the owners of the painting company, who were regularly present at the construction site and used the elevators, must have been aware of them.
The court also found that the employer had not taken sufficient effective measures to stop the harassment and had failed to fulfill the obligation to provide a harassment-free environment and to reasonably protect the employee from harassment.
As a result, the employee was entitled to compensation under the Equal Treatment Act. Furthermore, since the employer had failed to ensure a safe work environment where the employee was protected from psychological harm in accordance with the Working Environment Act the employer was found liable under general tort principles. The court also found a causal link between the harassment and the painter’s subsequent sick leave. She was therefore awarded DKK 57,704.22 for lost earnings and DKK 78,500 for pain and suffering, in addition to the compensation under the Equal Treatment Act.
Managing psychological work-related injuries
This legal development underlines the need for companies to establish clear HR policies on the psychological work environment and implement contingency plans for handling psychological strain. A written policy can clarify expectations and procedures, provide reassurance to employees, and serve as documentation of the employer’s efforts to provide a safe work environment in case of a work injury claim.
Managing psychological work-related injuries requires a comprehensive understanding of:
The employer’s obligations under the Working Environment Act
The application of the Workers’ Compensation Act regarding psychological injuries
Rules on the burden of proof and causality
The relevance of general tort law in work injury cases
Factors that may lead to the development of psychological distress/mental health issues among employees
Recommendation from the Danish Working Environment Authority
In addition, the Danish Working Environment Authority recommends that companies develop clear HR policies on the psychological work environment and establish a response plan for dealing with psychological strain.
Such a contingency plan should include:
Procedures for early detection of signs of distress, e.g., through the APV and ongoing dialogue
Clear guidelines for management’s response to psychological strain, including actions to take in cases of bullying, harassment, or other abusive behavior
Access to appropriate support measures, such as psychological counselling or external advisors, if needed
Possibility of involving authorised occupational health and safety consultants in complex or severe situations
An active effort in this area can not only prevent psychological harm but also improve the overall work environment and reduce the risk of liability under the Equal Treatment Act, the Anti-Discrimination Act, the Working Environment Act, and general tort law.
Mette Klingsten Law Firm advises clients on the prevention and management of psychological strain in the workplace. Please get in contact for further information and advice.
Other news
Psychological Work-related Injuries: A Focus on the Psychological Work Environment
An employer’s duty to ensure that working conditions are safe and health applies not only to the physical environment but also to the psychological work environment. Mental health issues/psychological harm caused by the work environment — including harassment, bullying, or lack of managerial support — can in some cases give rise to claims for compensation […]
The Danish Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of the Workers’ Compensation Act in Relation to Work from Home
On 2 May 2025, the Danish Supreme Court delivered an important ruling clarifying the scope of section 5 of the Danish Workers’ Compensation Act (arbejdsskadesikringsloven) in relation to injuries sustained while working from home. The Case An employer had instructed an employee to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic but had not provided any […]
New Supreme Court Judgment: Dismissal Following Fertility Treatment
The Supreme Court: Dismissal as a result of planned fertility treatment constituted discrimination in violation of section 4 of the Equal Treatment Act On 15 April 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in a case concerning the dismissal of a female employee who was about to start fertility treatment. Shortly before her holiday, the employee informed […]
Thanks to the following contributors to the website: Steen Evald (photograph), Stine Heilmann (photograph), Count Pictures (video), Kunde & Co. A/S (design), WeCode A/S (coding)